Policing on Aaron's Worthless Words

ONT Notes - AutoQoS

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000

AutoQoS benefits
- Automates QoS for most deployments
- Protects business-critical apps to maximize availability
- Simplifies QoS deployments
- Reduces configuration errors
- Cheaper, faster, and simpler deployments
- Follows DiffServ
- Allows complete control over QoS configs
- Allows modification of auto-generated configs
AutoQoS phases of evolution
- AutoQoS VOIP - Early version that configures the basics without discovery
- AutoQoS for Enterprise - Second version that only runs on routers and uses two-step process
  - Autodiscovery using NBAR
  - Generation of class maps
AutoQoS key elements
- Application classification
- Policy generation
- Configuration
- Monitoring and reporting
- Consistency
Interfaces that you can configure AutoQoS on
- Serial ifs with PPP and HDLC
- FR point-to-point subifs (NOT multipoint)
- ATM point-to-point subifs
- FR-to-ATM links
Prerequsites
- No Qos policy already configured on if
- CEF enabled on if
- Correct bandwidth configured on if
- IP address on low-speed if
Configuring AutoQoS Enterprise on a router (NOT a switch)
- auto qos discovery - begins discovery process
- auto qos - generates and applies MQC-based policies
Configuring AutoQoS VOIP
- auto qos voip [ trust | cisco-phone ]
Verifying AutoQoS on router
- show auto discovery qos - get autodiscovery results
- show auto qos - examine configuration generated
  - Number of classes
  - Classification options
  - Marking options
  - Queuing mechanisms
  - Other QoS mechanisms
  - If, subif, PVC where policy is applied
- show policy-map interface - look at if stats
Verify AutoQoS VOIP
- show auto qos
- show policy-map interface
- show mls qos maps - shows CoS to DSCP mappings
Possible issues with AutoQoS
- Too many traffic classes - manually consolidate some
- Configuration doesn’t change - rerun AutoQoS
- Configuration may not fit your situation - fine-tune it by hand
Fine-tuning AutoQoS
- Use QPM
- CLI
- copy policy into editor, change, reapply
AutoQoS can match on characteristics besides ACLs and NBAR
- match input interface
- match cos
- match ip precedence
- match ip dscp
- match ip rtp

ONT Notes - Pre-classify and End-to-end QoS

Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000

VPNs (Didn’t ISCW cover this?)
- Provide
  - Confidentiality
  - Integrity
  - Authentication
- Types
  - Remote-access
    - Client-initiated
    - NAS-initiated
  - Site-to-site
    - LAN-to-LAN
    - Extranet
L3 Tunneling protocols
- GRE
- IPSec
Pre-classify allows traffic to be classified before being sent across a tunnel or crypto-ed.
- qos pre-classify
- Provides a view into the original IP headers
- To classify on pre-tunnel header, apply the policy to the tunnel interface WITHOUT pre-classify.
- To classify on post-tunnel header, apply the policy to the physical interface WITHOUT pre-classify.
- To classify on pre-tunnel header, apply the policy to the physical interface WITH pre-classify.
SLA - agreement with provider to guarantee QoS mechanisms across their network based on your markings.
- Assures availability, loss, throughput, delay, and jitter.
End-to-end QoS
- To be effective, each hop in the path must have QoS configured similarly.
- Necessary in three locations
  - Campus - within the customer network
  - The edges - customer facing the provider, provider facing customer
  - On the provider network
QoS tasks
- Campus access switches
  - Speed/duplex settings
  - Classification
  - Trust
  - Phone/access switch configs
  - Multiple queues on switch ports, including priority for VOIP
- Campus distribution
  - L3 policing and marking
  - Multiple queues on switch ports, including priority for VOIP
  - WRED
- WAN edge
  - SLA definitions
  - LLQ
  - LFI
  - WRED
  - Shaping
- Provider cloud
  - Capacity planning
  - PHB
  - LLQ
  - WRED
Enterprise campus QoS implementation
- Implement multiple queues to avoid congestion
- Assign VOIP and video to highest priority queue
- Esablish trust boundaries
- Use policing to rate-limit excess traffic
- Use hardware QoS when possible
Control Plane Policing (CoPP)
- Applies QoS policy to traffic destined for the router
  - Routing protocols
  - Management protocols
- Can be used to avoid DOS attacks
- Applied to control-plane in global config

ONT Notes - Congestion Avoidance, Policing, Shaping, and Link Efficiency

Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000

Tail drop drawbacks
- TCP synchronization - Dropping TCP packets from different flows can cause them all to window down and back up again at the same time in cycles.
- TCP starvation - Non-TCP or aggressive flows can starve everyone else out when TCP throttles back.
- No differentiated drop - Tail drop doesn’t care who you are, so you get dropped if the queue is full.
RED - Random Early Detection
- Avoids tail drop by randomly dropping packets from the queue before it gets full
- Only dropped TCP flows slow down instead of everyone who has sent a packet since the queue filled
- Queues are smaller.
- Link utilization is more efficient
- Configured with
  - Minimum threshold - start dropping when the queue is this size
  - Maximum threshold - if the queue is this big, start tail dropping
  - Mark probability denominator (MPD) - 1/MPD is the ratio of packets to drop when between the thresholds
WRED - Weighted RED
- Based on IP precedence or DSCP values
- Less-important packets are dropped more aggressively than important packets
- Applied to an interface, VC or a class within a policy map
CBWRED - Class based WRED
- Configured with CBWFQ
Policing
- Limits subrate bandwidth (give you 100kbps on a T1)
- Limits traffic of certain applications
- Any traffic that exceeds police is dropped or re-classified; it’s a hard limit
- Inbound or outbound
Shaping
- Sets a limit but buffers any in excess
- Requires memory to store the buffer
- Buffers = delay and/or jitter
- Outbound only
- Can respond to network signals like BECNs and FECNs
Token and bucket
- The queue is a bucket; if a byte of data needs to be sent, it needs a token.
- If there are enough tokens, the traffic is considered conforming.
- If there aren’t enough tokens, the traffic is considered exceeding, which triggers the drop (policing), re-classify (policing), or buffer (shaping).
Frame relay traffic shaping (FRTS)
- Only controls frame relay traffic
- Applied on subif or DLCI
- Support fragmentation and interleaving
- Reacts to FECNs and BECNs
Compression
- Removed redundancy and patterns in data
- Less data = less latency
- Hardware compression or hardware-assisted compression does not involve the main CPU
- Software compression does
- Payload compression
- Header compression
Link fragmentation and interleaving
- Small data might be waiting for larger data pieces to finish sending
- Chunks data into smaller fragments so they don’t have to wait
- Interleaving shuffles flows in the Tx queue

ONT Notes - Queuing

Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000

Here are some more notes from my studies. Of course, no one cares about them but me, but it’s my blog. I’m sure someone will find it useful. Please help to correct dumbass mistakes.

Congestion
- Speed mismatch - traffic leaves a lower-bandwidth interface than the one it came in on
- Aggregation problem - lots of links with one egress of equal bandwidth
- Confluence problem - a bunch of traffic needs to egress out of the same interface
Queuing

ONT Notes – Classification, Marking, and NBAR

Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000

Here’s another set of notes from my ONT studies. I’m sure someone will find it useful. Please help to correct dumbass mistakes.

Classification is done with traffic desriptors
- Ingress interface
- CoS value on ISL or 802.1P frames
- Source/destination IP address
- IP Precedence or DSCP value
- MPLS EXP
- Application type
Layer 3 QoS
- Type of Service (ToS) is 8-bit field.
- First 3 bits of ToS are the IP precedence.
- First 6 bits of ToS are the DSCP value.
- Last 2 bits of ToS are explicit congestion notification (ECN).
Layer 2 QoS