<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Peer on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</title>
    <link>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/peer/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Peer on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/peer/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>EIGRP and OSPF - Are We Connected?</title>
      <link>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2014/06/eigrp-and-ospf-are-we-connected/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2014/06/eigrp-and-ospf-are-we-connected/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For both OSPF and EIGRP routers to become neighbors, their interface&amp;rsquo;s primary IP address must be on the same subnet. That statement is true. There is a difference in the definition of &amp;ldquo;same subnet&amp;rdquo;, though.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In OSPF, both routers have to be configured to be on the same subnet with the same mask or else they won&amp;rsquo;t neighbor up.  When an hello packet is sent, the subnet mask is sent embedded in there.  The router does a quick look to be sure the subnets are defined the same way on both ends.  If everything doesn&amp;rsquo;t match, they don&amp;rsquo;t neighbor. Here&amp;rsquo;s a &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.wireshark.org/&#34;&gt;Wireshark&lt;/a&gt; screenshot to show you the OSPF hello.  &lt;em&gt;Note: See edit below.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BGP Notes - Neighbor States</title>
      <link>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2011/06/bgp-notes-neighbor-states/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2011/06/bgp-notes-neighbor-states/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Corrections appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Idle&lt;/strong&gt; : There is no relationship, but the router sends out a TCP SYN to the neighbor to get the ball rolling.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Idle (admin)&lt;/strong&gt; : The neighbor is admined down.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Connect&lt;/strong&gt; : The router is waiting for the TCP connection to finish.  If the TCP connection finishes, the router sends an &lt;em&gt;open&lt;/em&gt; and transitions to OpenSent.  If it times out, it transitions to Active.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Active&lt;/strong&gt; : The router tries &lt;a href=&#34;http://greatlakesecho.org/about/&#34;&gt;Cialis&lt;/a&gt; to initiate a TCP connection.  If the TCP connection finishes, the router sends an &lt;em&gt;open&lt;/em&gt; and transitions to OpenSent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IIUC Notes - Inbound Dial Peer Matching</title>
      <link>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2011/01/iiuc-notes-inbound-dial-peer-matching/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2011/01/iiuc-notes-inbound-dial-peer-matching/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;More IIUC notes.  As always, feel free to correct as needed.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;To match inbound calls to a dial peer, CME (and CUCM?) uses the following steps.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Match DNIS (the dialed number) with the &lt;em&gt;incoming called-address&lt;/em&gt; config in the dial peer&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Match the ANI (the calling number or caller ID) with the &lt;em&gt;answer-address&lt;/em&gt; config in the dial peer&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Match the ANI with the &lt;em&gt;destination-pattern&lt;/em&gt; config in the dial peer&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Match an incoming POTS call to the &lt;em&gt;port&lt;/em&gt; config in the dial peer&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Match dial peer 0&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Matching dial peer 0 is bad, and it took me an inquiry on Twitter and a buddy to realize why.  Here are a few highlights as to why.  I believe the full scope of the badness of dial peer 0 is really beyond the IIUC exam.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
