<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bug on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</title>
    <link>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/bug/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bug on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/bug/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>CSCtd31622 - CSM, Cookies, and the year 2010</title>
      <link>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/01/csctd31622-csm-cookies-and-the-year-2010/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://38a8db03.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/01/csctd31622-csm-cookies-and-the-year-2010/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that we have another piece of evidence that Cisco doesn&amp;rsquo;t like the CSM.  From what I&amp;rsquo;m able to creatively interpret, the software developers didn&amp;rsquo;t think anyone would be running the CSM for very long, so they set a variable that expires CSM-inserted cookies at 01:01:50GMT on 1 January 2010&lt;a href=&#34;#1&#34;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;.  If you&amp;rsquo;re using cookies to make connections sticky, that means you may see some unexpected results; this shouldn&amp;rsquo;t affect the web servers&amp;rsquo; cookies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
